Feb 28, 2013 - Rosa Luxemburg, Russian Revolution. Critical Assessment of Weakness /1918/.

Eyewitness testimony of crimes Soviet Liders:

 'With the suppression of free political life throughout the country, life in the Soviets inevitably becomes more and more frozen.

 Without free elections, without unlimited freedom of the press and assembly, without a free struggle of opinions, life dies out in all public institutions, becomes only a semblance of life, in which only the bureaucracy remains the active element...

 Several only dozen energetic and experienced party leaders reign govern. Among them, only a dozen of the most prominent men actually lead, and only a select section of the working class assembles from time to time in meetings to applaud the speeches of the leaders and unanimously approve the proposed resolutions.

 Thus, it is a dictatorship of a clique, an undoubted dictatorship, but not of the proletariat, but of a handful of politicians.'

 Maybe you have to interested:
- March 8 - International Day of Solidarity for Sex Jobkers;
- Alexander Solzhenitsyn "Weeds". New York, 1985;
- The Political Testamentas of Adolf Hitler;
- Soviet Holocaust in East Prussia.

Feb 28, 2024 - Alexander Solzhenitsyn "Weeds". New York, 1985.

The Prophecies of Alexander Solzhenitsyn:

'And wherever I live, and whatever I do, I am eternally indebted to my MotherLand?
Therefore, because I had the misfortune of being born on the territory of this country, I am obliged to subordinate them interests entire life my convictions?
Motherland and Fatherland don't choose?
For some reason, this thesis only evokes laughter among all civilized people of the world. If a person who wants to reveal his abilities does not have suitable conditions in his country of residence, he easily moves to another country, as if to a neighboring quarter - choosing the most favorable conditions from those available. And only in countries predisposed to the dictatorial dominance of the primitive over the more advanced, one of which I have the misfortune to call the place of my birth, am I deprived of the right to this choice. This tendency promotes inertia, stagnation, the preservation of the obsolete and the general degradation of the region.
Civilized people, country  know how to learn from the best, more capable, more gifted and more strong. When 'more developed region conquer a region with more stupid population', this ultimately leads to the benefit of the latter, despite the inevitable sacrifices.
What happened to Europe after Napoleon conquered it? And what happened to India - when the English came there?
But the trouble with primitivism is that people with a primitive way of thinking do not know how, cannot, do not want to recognize realibe and  they replasiv and with desired illusory meaning. In conjunction with this primitively developed society, in the process demonstration self-importance, ascribes to itself imaginary merits to which it has no relationship, and therefore, in the eyes of civilization, they have no significance, even as Slaves.
But it is naive to expect that a nation with higher development, having subjugated an inferior one, will give it equal rights!
But the people of primitive community development fight, even where and when it makes no sense, and very often win. Their vitality is like that of weeds - with the same sterility.
The guilt of the primitive communites before the evolution of mankind is that they constantly spoiled the game more stronger socery with their unwillingness to vacate the place they occupied.
Anyone who wants to destroy the Soviet countrys, etnic group, peoples, diaspors, clans needs to know the following:
Throughout their history of Russian Empire, the Normans, were strong in what they hammered into their slaves' heads the conviction, blind and fanatical - that Faith, Power and Homeland are not chosen!
The inviolability of the first and second was shaken quite recently, and everyone knows what turn on and instability, what a blow this dialt to the Russian Empire - and the strength of the jews communists occupated Russian Empery was that they were able to quickly replace the fallen blocs with equally monolithic ones, instead of Faith and the Tsar, faith of Communism and Stalin.
But if these cult idols, slogans, and symbols as the support of Soviet moral and legal norms are smashed into small pieces, all Soviet countries, ethnic groups, diasporas, clans, and peoples will cease to exist.
Let there be many faiths, many ideas - red, yellow, blue, even orange - pluralism.
Let there be many leaders - arguing about who is the most important, killing each other in the rush to spread their influence - democracy.
Let there be many Fatherlands - republic, regions, districts, clans, families - sovereignty!
Let there be a war in which three quarters of those living today will die - as it was in Ukraine in the seventeenth century. But those who survive and get used to the new rules will be the self nature civilized people, able to painlessly integrate into the new world order.'

And here is what Erich Koch, Gauleiter of the 'Reichskommissariat of Ukraine', wrote about this a little earlier:

'The Reich is interested in deliveries of useful products from the occupied territories of the Soviet Union, for this target the survival of the natives is not a necessary condition.
Its ask me when the Reich will receive at least some economic benefit from the captured Soviet territories?
And I answer: never as long as there territory living Soviet ethnic groups calling themselves Slaves. The point is that the Slaves are a wild people.
I'm talking now not about their underdevelopment, sloppiness, laziness. Here I mean that sayd about animals are referred to as "wild" or "domestic" and if the latter can be brought into submission with a whip, then a wild beast by nature will not become docile when beaten. The same is true with peoples, regardless of culture - an African black or a civilized Frenchman, having submitted to force, will integrate themselves into the any new order, having resigned themselves to their lower level.
This the Slaves are not even capable of appreciating the proper care that a good master gives to a working animal - if you turn away, they will stab you in the back, simply because you are their master!
At here I am talking about Russian Slaves - since the western subspecies of Slaves, Poles or Ukrainians, have already been significantly ennobled by the proximity of European civilization. Thus, among the Poles, it is quite common to voluntarily recognize a hierarchy in which they place themselves below us, Germans, but much above Russians and Ukrainians. The same can be said about the Galicians, who in former times were under the rule not of Russia, but of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.
And the yellow-blue banner of the 'true Ukrainians' was at one time the flag of the auxiliary units of the army of Charles of Sweden, who served him faithfully and truly against the Russian Holstein-Gottorp dynasty (a junior branch of the German House of Oldenburg that ruled Denmark). Colonize, exploit Slaves of Vikkings? This is utopia! Unprofitable - you will simply go broke on the need to maintain security. Consequently, the Reich is in no way interested in the preservation of this useless people. Let them die out like the American Indians - or survive in small numbers in remote forests as an object of study for anthropologists.
The right to live as our slaves must also be earned - through loyalty, honesty, and diligence.'

but excuse me, both the Soviet social socialist leaders and the German national-socialist leaders proceed from the understanding of ownership of people as animals - pigs, cows, sheep, goats and others. But what about Wolves, Bears, Lions, Panthers?
They also consider pigs, cows, sheep, goats, and others as their property, which, if they do not exploit, then they are part of their nutritional ration, and here social, and national leaders - takzhe for them is only food.
Nature here is a third force that is higher than both leaders and animals, including man, and as the practice of loving conquest shows, it ends with all time  tragedies - where they on nature what  speak wildly only because this world is not under their control.
And who knows how it will all end ?

Maybe you same will by interest:
- Socialists, Communists, Trade Unionist, Zionists, Nazists... When did they come to kill, or when again will they come to rob, rape, kill; 
- The Tale of the Revolution and a Personalitys - from marerials archive of cases of State security Soviet Union;
- Soviet Holocaust in East Prussia;
- The Political Testamentas of Adolf Hitler;
- Theory of Nationalism, 88 articls from David Lain. 

Feb 5, 2013 - Slavs, Slaves, Slavas, Славяне - words synonyms with the root a Slave.

In order for this article to be substantiated, let's look into the past, into the theory of racial inequality from its founder Hans Gunther, and then, from it follow to simple logical path.

 In order to avoid any reason for various manipulations sending of wishful thinking, once again a constactable fact is that - The theory of the inequality of races, the ability of races to develop, work and, conversely, the tendency to degradation, as well as  some other aspects of the genesis of civilization, taking into account the analytical and evaluative nature, was developed by the German anthropologist and racial theorist Hans Gunther.

 His racial, etnishgroup theory identifies the main types of people by distinctive anthropological features - cranial index, body proportions, face, absolute size and pigmentation (hair, eye, skin color). Each type is attributed with certain mental and intellectual qualities. There is nothing about a Slavs there.

 Here are the main types of racias:

- Nordic type

 Tall dolichocephals. Narrow long face, hair color varies from blond to dark blond, blue, gray or yellow eyes, narrow long nose, angular protruding chin. Common in Northern Germany and Holland, Latvia, Scandinavia, East Anglia, Northern Poland, Northwestern Russia, as well as along the entire Baltic coast, except for the northern one. Characterized as reasonable, fair, calculating, prudent, cold, often cruel people. In terms of mental giftedness, they are ranked first.

- East Baltic type

 Brachycephalic people of short or medium height, with a broad, stocky build. A broad face, grey-yellow or grey-brown hair, grey or blue eyes, a relatively wide short nose. Common in the East Slavic, Baltic, and northern Finno-Ugric countries. They are characterized as hospitable, patient people with a good imagination, quick mood swings, who do not value money and are incapable of making decisions. In terms of mental giftedness, they are ranked approximately third.

- Western (Mediterranean) type

 Short dolichocephals, slender graceful build. Similar in proportions to the Nordic type. Dark hair and eyes, darkish skin. Common in Spain, Italy, less common in France, Ireland. Characterized as very emotional, cheerful, frivolous people, slightly prone to cruelty and laziness. In terms of mental giftedness, they are ranked fifth.

- Eastern type or Alpine. 

 Short brachycephalic, stocky build, prone to obesity. Wide, round face, dark hair and eyes, wide and short nose. Widespread everywhere, especially in Scandinavia, Spain, France, West Slavic countries, but do not make up the majority anywhere. Characterized as calm, peace-loving, withdrawn, self-sufficient, thrifty, prone to greed and led people. In terms of mental giftedness, they are ranked fourth.

and so on...

 And here is what relates to the justified definition of the word Slavs as a definition of the understanding of this word:

 The derivation of the word slave encapsulates a bit of European history and explains why the two words slaves and Slavs are so similar; they are, in fact, historically identical. The word slave first appears in English around 1290, spelled sclave. The spelling is based on Old French esclave from Medieval Latin sclavus, "Slav, slave," first recorded around 800. Sclavus comes from Byzantine Greek sklabos (pronounced sklävs) "Slav," which appears around 580. Sklavos approximates the Slavs' own name for themselves, the Slovnci, surviving in English Slovene and Slovenian. The spelling of English slave, closer to its original Slavic form, first appears in English in 1538. Slavs became slaves around the beginning of the ninth century when the Holy Roman Empire tried to stabilize a German-Slav frontier. By the 12th century stabilization had given way to wars of expansion and extermination that did not end until the Poles crushed the Teutonic Knights at Grunwald in 1410. · As far as the Slavs' own self-designation goes, its meaning is, understandably, better than "slave"; it comes from the Indo-European root *kleu-, whose basic meaning is "to hear" and occurs in many derivatives meaning "renown, fame." The Slavs are thus "the famous people." Slavic names ending in -slav incorporate the same word, such as Czech Bohu-slav, "God's fame," Russian Msti-slav, "vengeful fame," and Polish Stani-slaw, "famous for withstanding (enemies)."

And in conclusion, as a convincing argument for proishozhdeniya and understanding of the word Slovyane, we will trace such a thought - by analyzing letopisey, roniki, sagam, tale, the Rurikovichs did not consider themselves Slavs, and their own genetic origin as and others of the Russian great princes was indicated from the Roman emperor Augustus, from the legandary Prus from Bithynia. While the assigned or attached, belonging them souls were designated as slaves or slavs.